Evaluating websites takes time. We all want information right away, but it takes longer to look for the key parts of a website, article, etc. that make it credible than it would be to just get the information. Overall, all these methods get at the central idea of evaluating websites for Accuracy, Authority, Objectivity, Currency, Coverage, and Relevancy (A.A.O.C.C.R. does not make an easily memorable acronym). It is probably best to find out if your school / district uses a specific method, and if they do stay with it as having students use different methods in different classes would be confusing.
Stop
Investigate (the source)
Find (better coverage)
Trace (claims, quotes, content to original sources)
Try my own methods for evaluating government resources, primary sources, and community resources for teachers!
Evaluate government resources with B.L.A.R.G.S.
Bias (Who is writing it? Why are they writing it?)
Links (Do links work or is the site no longer maintained?)
Age (How old is the website? How old is the content? When was it last updated?)
Relevance (Does it connect to classroom content?)
Grade (Is the content grade appropriate for reading levels and comprehension?)
Sources (What is the information based on and where does the information come from? Is it accurate, reputable, and / or peer-reviewed?)
Evaluate primary sources with P.H.A.T.E.R.
Perspective (Bias / viewpoint. Who is writing it? Why are they writing it? Does it add another dimension to the topic?)
History (Where was it created, when was it created, and was it created in reaction to something?)
Age (Is the content age appropriate for reading levels and comprehension?)
Type (What kind of source is it — recording, journal, photograph, document, etc?)
Established (Why was this material preserved or highlighted? Why would a collector, archivist, librarian, donor, publisher, etc. disseminate it?)
Readability (Is it transcribed? Can you read and confirm the original text? Can you understand the spelling, vocabulary, and / or the vernacular?)
Evaluate community resources with L.A.R.V.A.
Locality (How close is the source to your location? How does it connect to your local learning?)
Accessibility (What is the resource — can it be shown in the classroom, be accessed online, presented with a guest speaker, or bring the class on a field trip?)
Relevance (How does the content relate to classroom learning?)
Voice (From what perspective is the resource, who is sharing the information, and why?)
Accuracy (Is the information presented correct?)